The Peter Enns Controversy at Westminster

Paul Matzko offers his commentary on the irony of the Peter Enns situation
Many helpful links from Brandon Withrow: CLICK HERE

Beale from a Christianity today interview:

If you want a good example of someone who would disagree with our method, there’s a recent book by Peter Enns called Inspiration and Incarnation. In one of the concluding chapters, he contends that Jesus and the apostles preached the right doctrine from the wrong texts and that we should do the same. I have written a lengthy review of that chapter in the periodical Themelios. Enns responded, and then I wrote a surrejoinder just on this very issue.

Warfield on Inerrancy

“This is a rather serious arraignment of the common sense of the whole series of preceding generations. What! Are we to believe that no man until our wonderful nineteenth century, ever had acumen enough to detect a printer’s error or to realize the liability of hand-copied manuscripts to occasional corruption? Are we really to believe that the happy possessors of ‘the Wicked Bible’ held ‘thou shalt commit adultery’ to be divinely ‘inerrant’ as the genuine text of the seventh commandment–on the ground that the ‘inerrancy of the original autographs of the Holy Scriptures’ must not be asserted ‘as distinguished from the Holy Scriptures which we now possess’? … Of course, every man of common sense from the beginning of the world has recognized the difference between the genuine text and the errors of transmission, and has attached his confidence to the former in rejection of the latter.”